Talkabout Primary MFL

A network for anyone teaching languages in Primary

I'm wondering if anyone can help. I'm sure somewhere I have read/heard/seen that the entitlement for all KS2 children for languages should be 1 hour a week but I cannot find it anywhere. Have looked through the framework and all I can see is that all KS2 children have entitlement to learn a language; please help me to find where I've seen this. My headteacher wants to know so that we can sort out our strategy for next year.

Thanks

Share

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Emma
I too was under the impression Entitlement was one hour, not all in one block necessarily but if you refer back to previous discussions Entitlement- Jan Lendowski's reply, Runaway's reply on TES 10.5.09 the situation seems a little unclear. Then I don't think the Rose report mentions any specific time frame.
No doubt Jo will be able to tell you more or try googling Helen Myers replies on TES

Reply to This

As Lorraine says, many aspects of the 'entitlement' are still unclear. However, as you point out, the Framework clearly mentions an allocation of no less than 60 minutes per week for language work - just in case you need to find this in black and white, refer to Part 2 of the Framework, Section 1 (Primary Language Learning) pg 9 and again Part 2, Section 2 (Co-ordinating Provision) pg 25.

Hope this helps.

Reply to This

Confusion about the terms is very common- you are not alone! It all revolves around the term `entitlement' which is a very nebulous concept. Children have had the `entitlement' for a while but it isn't necessarily being delivered yet! There is no `entitlement' to one hour p/w; this is a recommendation to which most schools subscribe if they are already teaching primary languages. The hour is an aspirationfor some schools, derived from maybe a half hour dedicated lesson and `bits' throughout the week. Even the Rose Report does not specify 1 hour; this has just become accepted practice.

Do contact your local PML consultant for further clarification if possible. I currently work for Cambridgeshire and we have tried to clarify this for our teachers. BTW, I'm Funambule on TES so was a party to this discussion. We absolutely need clarity in this; it is too open to misinterpretation.

Reply to This

Thank you, that's really helpful. I think for our school at the moment it is definitely an aspiration but neither myself or the head could find anywhere that said it the other day so we weren't quite sure if we'd imagined it. Thanks for clearing it up.

Reply to This

RSS

Members

  • Louise Shapley
  • Baby Lea Lee
  • Ronan L
  • cherrypips
  • Rick
  • MarkL66
  • Stacey Woolrdige
  • DJ Ellenbacher
  • Helen Leigh
  • Jenny Berry
  • Lawri Jones
  • Michelle Panting
  • Fátima Duerden
  • William M Tweedie
  • leena mahadevia

Number of visitors to this page since 1st January 2009

TalkaboutMFL on Del.icio.us

Unless otherwise expressly stated, all original material of whatever nature created by Jo Rhys-Jones and included in the Talkabout Primary Ning and any related pages, including the weblog's archives, is licensed under a
Creative Commons Licence.
Creative Commons License

About

Jo Rhys-Jones Jo Rhys-Jones created this social network on Ning.

Latest Activity

Ronan L and Baby Lea Lee joined Talkabout Primary MFL
19 hours ago
Jenny Berry is now a member of Talkabout Primary MFL
yesterday
Lawri Jones is now a member of Talkabout Primary MFL
on Friday
Mark Purves added a blog post
I was trying to put together something on this and courtesy of the Sunderland MFL Christmas resources site put together this Smartboard Notebook file. It includes a Connect4 game to play with the pupils in teams as they try and memorise what they ha…
on Friday

© 2009   Created by Jo Rhys-Jones

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy  |  Terms of Service